He did not like what james said about faith and works. This scripture must have posed quite a problem for martin luther. Aug 20, 2009 the book of esther has always presented the problem that god is never mentioned in the book. In a word, he james wanted to guard against those who relied on faith without works, but was unequal to the task. Few books in the bible have received as much attention and criticism as james because of its strong support for keeping the law of god. Martin luther was not the only person to doubt or reject the book of esther as holy scripture, although he may have been the first to ignite massconfusion surrounding the book.
Why did martin luther take 7 books out of the bible. But very quickly his criticism of indulgences became a rejection of the papacy and the catholic church emphasizing the bible as the sole authority for christian faith, radicalizing a continent, fracturing the holy roman empire, and dividing western civilization in ways luthera deeply. Opinions of martin luther like other theologians before and after him, martin luther had opinions of certain biblical books. Consumed in the debate, he went beyond a proper understanding of the scriptures and dismissed james statements that works are a necessary evidence of faith. Martin luther downgraded the significance of revelation. Why did martin luther change his surname from luder to. In fact, he once offered his doctors cap to anyone who could reconcile it with romans 3. James was rejected by the ancients, i praise it and consider it a good book, because it sets up no doctrines of.
I thought a biography about martin luther is boring. Im convinced that we dont really have a conflict here. Early in his work as bible lecturer and translator luther expressed doubt as to whether james, hebrews, and revelation are truly apostolic part of the inspired new testament. Here is luthers original preface to james, although he later seemed to be more open to the idea of apostolic authorship. Martin luther and the book of james shameless popery. If you only looked at direct mentions of christ by name, martin. James was rejected by the ancients, i praise it and consider it a good book, because it sets up no doctrines of men but vigorously promulgates the law of god.
New york times bestseller metaxas is a scrupulous chronicler and has an eye for a good story. What were martin luthers problems with the book of esther. Six points on luthers epistle of straw almost five hundred years after the fact, roman catholics still scrutinize martin luther. The epistle of james along with 1 peter, 2 peter, 1 john, 2 john, 3 john and jude is included in a section of the bible known as the general epistles. Martin luther s introduction to the new testament in luther s bible and john calvins commentaries on matthew 27. If a person says he has faith, but he gives no outward evidence of that faith through righteous works, his faith will not justify him. In some cases, luther argues that it was not written by an apostle. Luther and the epistle of straw the calvinist international.
Luther s controversial writing concerning the epistle of james and the revelation can be found in volume 35 of luther s works, american edition, pages 395397 and 399400. Many people know martin luther\s opinion of james and wonder whether james is. But many people know martin luthers opinion of the book, or think they do, and wonder whether james is really to be placed on the same level as the gospels or paul. The key point of luther s biblical exegesis was his conviction of christs being the rex scripturae. To martin luther, james was an epistle of straw that had nothing of the nature of the gospel about it. Heres the full context of luthers evaluation from his preface to the new testament. Did martin luther really want james taken out of the bible. His views on the book of james, for example, are wellknown.
Protestant reformer martin luther cogwriter although protestants like to think positively about martin luther because of his supposed belief in sola scriptura the bible alone, the truth is that martin luther changed parts of the bible and discounted the value of many books notice a change he admitted to regarding romans 3. Apr 02, 2014 the great protestant reformer, martin luther, infamously referred to the book of james as an epistle of straw in his preface to the german new testament. Many people today misapply luthers words, not understanding the circumstances behind them. Why did martin luther remove 7 books from the bible.
Martin luther s hostility to the book of james is wellknown, and ive mentioned it in other contexts, but i wanted to consider today the implications for the lutheran view of justification, at the heart of the reformation and of modern catholicprotestant disputes. Martin luther and the book of james by joe heschmeyer martin luthers hostility to the book of james is wellknown, and ive mentioned it in other contexts, but i wanted to consider today the implications for the lutheran view of justification, at the heart of the reformation and of modern catholicprotestant disputes. I remember when we had a course on the book of james, that luther was said to not like this book. Luthers comment about james being an epistle of straw, as compared to the theological signifiance of pauls writings, is his most well known comment on the book. Martin luther luther, martin, 14831546 the online books page. In fact, luther referred to the book of james as an epistle of straw and sought unsuccessfully to have the entire book. Theres a popular luther narrative that plays out a little like star wars. The earliest writings of the bible were likely composed in the 10th century b. It is primarily because of its sharp focus on works being a critical part of salvation that martin luther did not like the book of james. Martin luthers life was one of dedication and chaste behavior. Martin luther luther, martin, 14831546 online books about this author are available, as is a wikipedia article luther, martin, 14831546. Luthers treatment of the disputed books of the new testament. Luther concluded that he could not readily harmonize the god described in revelation with the god to whom jesus prayed to as abba.
He praises james as a book which teaches well on gods law, but notes that it contains no mention of christs passion or resurrection, and so, no true gospel. Luther famously referred to the book of james as an epistle of straw, purportedly because of its lackluster portrayal of the gospel and the ease with which it might be used to foster doctrines of worksrighteousness. To luther, the book of james seemed to support the idea that people contributed to their salvation by their good works. In his preface to the new testament, luther ascribed to several books of the new testament different degrees of doctrinal value. This can be understood in part through his references to the protestant reformer, martin luther. Roper is especially good on luthers unusual upbringing as the son of a mining family. Martin luthers introduction to the new testament in luthers bible and john calvins commentaries on matthew 27. Later lutherans followed luther s old testament list and rejected the deuterocanonical books, but they did not follow his rejection of the new testament books. Be that as it may, here is a quick overview of this intensely practical epistle. Jun, 20 luther famously referred to the book of james as an epistle of straw, purportedly because of its lackluster portrayal of the gospel and the ease with which it might be used to foster doctrines of worksrighteousness. He is a nationally recognized luther scholar as well as a popular speaker and lecturer. Why did luther not consider the book of james to be. Richard dawkins in his book the god delusion demonstrates a very poor understanding of theology and matters of religion.
Five hundred years ago, luther reclaimed the gospel from the medieval church, but did he leave the book of james behind. Work of faith excludes boasting unless one boasts in what jesus did to. Was it a doctrinal stance against these four books. Here are a couple quotes from him from luther works vol. He repeats this often, and also notes others before him did as well. Similarly, when i hear the gospel, i hear nothing about myself or about my works that could justify me before god. I always thought that i knew martin luther and his story. The biblical book of james is full of wisdom and is regularly quoted by ministers preaching against gossip the section on taming the tongue in chapter three is powerful stuff. The following is the translation from luthers works, vol. Now in green are some comments that luther originally made that were in editions of his bible prior to 1530. While the lutheran confessions specifically did not define a canon, it is widely regarded as the canon of the lutheran church. Yesterday was martin luthers 531st birthday, and today is the feast day of st.
In this case the works james was speaking of was merely controlling your tongue. Luther s theology challenged the authority of the papacy by holding that the bible is the only infallible source of religious authority and that all baptized. What is less well known or talked about, is that luther also praised the book of james in the same preface. In his book basic theology, charles caldwell ryrie countered the claim that luther rejected the book of james as being noncanonical. This question is from our facebook group, docs thoughts. A more recent short biography is that by the distinguished lutheran historian, martin marty, in the penguin brief lives series. It portrays god as inflicting horrendous punishments on humanity a concept that is today sometimes called ambush theology. This list of books by martin luther contains a bibliography of the works of martin luther in print, online or other formats, in english translation and original language. In this class of disputed books are the epistle to the hebrews. Luthers controversial writing concerning the epistle of james and the revelation can be found in volume 35 of luthers works, american edition, pages 395397 and 399400. Not only was martin luther wrong on this matter, but he did include the book in his new testamen. And the key word to come to terms with is word, which appears four times in the passage verses 18, 21, 22, and 23.
The book of esther and martin luther baptist christian. In fact, for that reason, martin luther did not want it included in the canon of scripture. Martin luthers hostility to the book of james is wellknown, and ive. I have found though that those who chastise luther on his rejection of james tend to ignore the many statements in which he questions the book because of authorship. Following luthers lead, 19th century german scholarship continued an strongly antijewish assault on both the old and new testaments, attacking the authorship, date. The canon of scripture is the list of 73 books that belong to the bible. However, to state my own opinion about it, though without prejudice to anyone, i do not. Due to a perceived conflict with pauls letters, and the early disfavor of martin luther, its status as a canonical book was disputed as late as the protestant reformation in the 16th century. Nestingen has taught church history at luther seminary in st. The book of james is so clear that it even says that your religion is worthless if it does not include the proper works. Why was martin luther attempting to change the canon. Martin luther changed andor discounted 18 books of the bible. You were not a man of dead faith, but of belief that was alive and active, even at the risk of being rash and god often had his good purposes in your bent to action.
Im a protestant as ive pointed out many times, and i agree with a lot of luther did, but wasnt it a little disingenuous of him to want to remove the book of jamesand hebrews because he thought he thought it contradicted his theology. The james to whom the book is traditionally ascribed is not the brother of john martyred by herod acts 12. Assuming we accept the letters authorship by james the just, the brother of jesus, it could have been written any time between 40 and 60 ad, but probably closer to 60 ad. Luthers canon is the biblical canon attributed to martin luther, which has influenced protestants since the 16thcentury protestant reformation. About this book of the revelation of john, i leave everyone free to hold his own opinions. Six points on luthers epistle of straw james white. According to a book by james nestingen, on luthers gospel discovery, his tower experience, i agree with nestingen and lohse that it probably coincided with his name change from luder the luther, a small change based on the greek word for freedom, elutherius. I adhere to the fact that i am baptized, not to my life and my vocation, but to the man called jesus christ. But apart from the last 80 pages, this book was not only exciting to read, but made martin luther a new role model for me. Other scholars did as well, both reformed and catholic. Finding jesus in the book of james banner of truth usa. Through this faithperspective on martin luther s life and his theology it was very enriching to read the book.
A life 2003 and sources and contexts of the book of concord coeditor, 2001. Brother martin, so well did you embody a life of receiving gods grace. Marin luther denies the book of james because it teaches that salvation is through works, not through faith alone. He called james a straw epistle because he thought james was opposing paul on justification through faith alone. This acceptable way of living a christian life is not only supported in the old testament see isaiah 58. The biblical book of james is full of wisdom and is regularly quoted by ministers.
He is always named next after jesus in lists of jesus brothers, so he was presumably considered to be jesus next younger brother. Nestingen is the author of numerous books, including martin luther. I am so great an enemy to the second book of the maccabees, and to esther, that i wish they had not come to us at. Its often said that luther was so opposed to the book of james that he. Lutheran theologians like to make a distinction between the books of the new testament which were unanimously received as canonical in the early church the socalled homologoumena or undisputed books and the books which were disputed by some the antilegomena. Christians, why did martin luther want to remove the book. One the most popular quotations from luther is the infamous epistle of straw remark, directed at the canonicity of the book of james. Through this faithperspective on martin luthers life and his theology it was very enriching to read the book. The book of esther has always presented the problem that god is never mentioned in the book. Martin luthers description of the epistle of james changes.
Martin luther and the book of james by joe heschmeyer martin luthers hostility to the book of james is wellknown, and ive mentioned it in other contexts, but i wanted to consider today the implications for the lutheran view of justification, at the heart of the reformation and of. Do these four books contain doctrines that we should, per martin luther, not believe. When martin luther published his 95 theses in october 1517, he had no intention of starting a revolution. The book of james has long been considered one of the shakiest books of the new testament in terms of its acceptance into the canon. Martin luther s description of the epistle of james changes.
He did, however, suggest it be thrown out of schools. In his chapter the roots of religion page 190 dawkins appears to argue that christianity is against logical reasoning, which is. Jun 06, 2012 this question is from our facebook group, docs thoughts. That said, there is simply not a mechanism for removing anything from the canon in christian circles. The theology of james, peter, and jude course, taught by peter davids, offers a comprehensive exploration of the theology of james, 12 peter, and jude, including introductory issues and major themes, and also shows how each book relates to the broad picture of new testament theology. Martin luther rejects the book of revelation the law of god and the ten commandments. While researching an answer to a different question, i found that martin luther attempted to remove hebrews, james, jude and revelation from the bible. He was the son of joseph, a construction worker who originally lived in nazareth in galilee. Martin luther was a german monk, theologian, university professor and church reformer whose ideas inspired the protestant reformation and changed the course of western civilization. For luther, the book was not written by an apostle, but rather a later christian. Martin luthers revelation of saved by faith is the foundation for his split from his former.
Why did martin luther discard the book of revelation. Martin luther struggled greatly with james not by faith alone jam. Martin luther was openly critical of james, and he wondered whether the epistle belonged in our bibles, but he never formally proposed it should be removed. As for the phrase epistle of straw, that doesnt mean luther thought it was worthless. Here is luther s original preface to james, although he later seemed to be more open to the idea of apostolic authorship. Its not worthless, but its not a book to turn to for the foundational teaching of the faith.
A new biography of martin luther reveals the life beyond. Thats where the foundation of jamess call to action is plainest. Martin luther resisted the publication of a combined edition of his works for multiple reasons, although it finally consented to write a preface to such a publication in 1539. Martin luther, john calvin, or john knox would absolutely agree with. Martin luther quotes author of the bondage of the will. Martin luther is one of the antichrist as the false apostle paul.
The edition of 1530 omitted in spirit, thought, and words. Martin luther rejected many books from the catholic old testament and set them apart in a. Biblical inerrancy was imagined by others, long after luther and calvin had died. Martin luther disliked james, in particular, for its emphasis on works. A commentary on the epistle to the galatians abridged translation, trans. Through him, i am in grace and have forgiveness of sin. I hear about christ, who has been given to me by the father for my redemption from. Martin luther was a bit hard on james, since the letter didnt fit closely enough to his carefully defined doctrine of sola fide, only faith. Luthers theology challenged the authority of the papacy by holding that the bible is the only infallible source of religious authority and that all baptized. Thus, he writes on luther with considerable passion.
While the lutheran confessions specifically did not define a canon, it is. He specifically objected to the position of james that faith cannot actually exist without works, which i think is absolutely correct. Protestant reformer martin luther cogwriter although protestants like to think positively about martin luther because of his supposed belief in sola scriptura the bible alone, the truth is that martin luther changed parts of the bible and discounted the value of many books. Jul 14, 2011 martin luther was not the only person to doubt or reject the book of esther as holy scripture, although he may have been the first to ignite massconfusion surrounding the book. The book of esther and martin luther baptist christian forums. It seems like a fitting time to give an honest assessment of some of the darker parts of luthers legacy, and consider their implications. Martin luther wanted to take the book of james out of the bible. Now in green are some comments that luther originally made that were in. It differs from the 1546 roman catholic canon of the council of trent in that it rejects the deuterocanonical books and. Howard hendricks of dallas theological seminary often said that when one reads this book, he or she has the uneasy feeling that james had been reading hisher mail. Apr 03, 2007 six points on luthers epistle of straw almost five hundred years after the fact, roman catholics still scrutinize martin luther.
707 1024 68 1060 1289 853 582 949 1159 280 1526 1078 1427 157 787 966 562 1236 910 60 504 768 278 438 1495 1328 942 1384 150 1263 175 1085 1182 578 38 1451 330 540 571